White supremacy promotes the belief Whites are superior to other ethnicities. Different forms have differing conceptions of who is considered White.
Wednesday, 29 September 2010
David HOROWITZ (1939-)
Friday, 24 September 2010
Franklin PIERCE (1804–1869)
James BUCHANAN (1791–1868)
Roger B. TANEY (1777–1864)
Walt DISNEY (1901–1966)
Henry FORD (1863–1947)
David DUKE (1950 - )
The Holocaust is the device used as the pillar of Zionist imperialism, Zionist aggression, Zionist terror and Zionist murder.(Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236014,00.html)
Strom THURMOND (1902–2003)
Jesse HELMS (1921–2008)
Wednesday, 22 September 2010
Newt GINGRICH (1943-)
John TYNDALL (1934–2005)
Nick GRIFFIN (1959-)
Arthur JENSEN (1923-)
J. Philippe RUSHTON (1943-)
Richard LYNN (1930-)
Tony BLAIR (1953-)
Alma Bridwell WHITE (1862–1946)
Branford CLARKE (1885–1947)
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
Margaret THATCHER (1925-)
...
Bernard INGHAM (1932-)
Samuel P. HUNTINGTON (1927–2008)
F. W. de KLERK (1936-)
Jan SMUTS (1870–1950)
Daniel François MALAN (1874–1959)
Johannes Gerhardus STRIJDOM (1893-1958)
Hendrik VERWOERD (1901–1966)
Monday, 20 September 2010
B J VORSTER
(1915 - 1983)
Pieter Willem BOTHA (1916–2006)
Janusz WALUś
(1953 -)
A White wanting to live in the past.
Margaret MITCHELL
(1900–1949)
Among critics Gone With the Wind has always been controversial. Few regard it as great literature, but beginning with the Pulitzer Prize Committee many critics have admired Mitchell's gift for storytelling and the breadth of her canvas. The book has been hailed as a contribution to feminism, held up as an allegory for the development of the United States, and condemned as racist and even sadomasochistic. Racist it unquestionably is - almost inevitably so, given the time and place of its composition. Beyond that, it gives powerful support to damaging stereo-types that for long helped sustain racial segregation. It romanticizes the slave-owning class, and, except perhaps for D.W. Griffith's classic Birth of a Nation, no work has done more to misrepresent Reconstruction as a cruelty visited upon an innocent white South - whereas today historians generally agree that it was an honest, if flawed, attempt to bring real democracy to a region that had never known it. In light of the book's continuing sales the controversy over it seems destined to persist, like Gone With the Wind itself.("Margaret Mitchell [http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3404704493.html]." Encyclopedia of World Biography. 2004. Encyclopedia.com. 28 July 2012
Calvin COOLIDGE (1872–1933)
Madison GRANT (1865–1937)
Matthew F HALE (1971-)
Arthur SCHOPENHAUER (1788–1860)
Saturday, 18 September 2010
William FAULKNER (1897–1962)
Nathan FORREST (1821–1877)
Achilles Clark, a soldier with the 20th Tennessee cavalry, wrote to his sister immediately after the Battle of Fort Pillow:
The slaughter was awful. Words cannot describe the scene. The poor, deluded, negroes would run up to our men, fall upon their knees, and with uplifted hands scream for mercy but they were ordered to their feet and... General Forrest ordered them shot down like dogs...
Edward LONG (1734–1813)
Niall FERGUSON (1964-)
Monday, 13 September 2010
Albert SCHWEITZER (1875–1965)
Sunday, 12 September 2010
Charles DARWIN (1809–1882)
Thursday, 9 September 2010
Abraham LINCOLN (1809–1865)
Writing to Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune, in August 1862Dear Sir: ...I have not meant to leave any one in doubt... My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or destroy Slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it; and if I could do it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that. What I do about Slavery and the colored race, I do because it helps to save this Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union... I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty, and intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men, everywhere, could be free. Yours. A. Lincoln.
Speaking in charleston, illinois, 1858I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of brining about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races (applause); that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifiying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people...
And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the posoition of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other [White] man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
Andrew JACKSON (1767–1845)
President Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the United States
Supreme Court decisions on the Cherokee right to self-rule.
Charles MURRAY (1943-)
Richard HERRNSTEIN (1930–1994)
James MADISON (1751–1836)
Thomas JEFFERSON (1743–1826)
George WASHINGTON (1732–1799)
Monday, 6 September 2010
Christopher COLUMBUS (1451 – 1506)
When Columbus and his sailors came ashore, carrying swords, speaking oddly, the Arawaks ran to greet them, brought them food, water, gifts. He later wrote of this in his log:
They brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks' bells. They willingly traded everything they owned. ...They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features. ...They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of cane. ...They would make fine servants. ...With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.
These Arawaks of the Bahama Islands were much like Indians on the mainland, who were remarkable (European observers were to say again and again) for their hospitality, their belief in sharing.
Racist acts by white men in the Americas began on October 14, 1492, two days after the arrival of Christopher Columbus. In his journal, Columbus tells about his actions that day: "These people are very unskilled in arms, as Your Highnesses will see from the seven whom I caused to be taken in order to carry them off." Indeed he brought the seven Tainos back to Spain to show to his patrons, along with parrots and produce. Ferdinand and Isabella then provided Columbus with 1,200-1,500 men, 17 ships, cannons, cross-bows, guns, cavalry, and attack dogs for his return this second voyage marks the real significance of Christopher Columbus, for in 1493 he undertook an enterprise altogether new in human history: the conquering of one land (Haiti, first) by another (Spain) an ocean away. at the same time he started the subjugation of one people ("Indians," as renamed by Columbus) by another ("Europeans," as they later came to be called, or "whites")' concomitantly introducing the ideology of racism. Soon enough a Catholic bishop in Spain was denying the basic humanity of Native Americans to rationalize enslaving them. We live with the consequences to this day.
about us
- Frank TALKER™
- United Kingdom